Council votes to reject Athol battery energy storage site

A barren brownish field with a square paved pad of rectangular shipping containers and other box-like objects surrounding it. Trees and green grass border it from the north.
An example of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). Photo taken from the State Government of Victoria - Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action.
CJPE - 99.3 FM - CJPE - PictonON | 02-02-2023
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on email
Share on print

On Tuesday (Jan. 31), Prince Edward County Council at a special session voted to deny their support for the proposed Athol battery energy storage system (BESS) project on Mowbray Road.

Council’s decision (which was in the wake of their denial for the much larger Picton BESS site), was for the negative, despite a staff report calling for acceptance of the proponent Solar Flow-Through Funds’s pair of 3 MW BESS sites. The staff report was in the affirmative because of the project’s utility in local grid stability and because the outstanding risks of the lithium-phosphate technology could be addressed in a later site approval process. However, the report’s author admitted that they were not an expert in electrical systems and that the data concerning lithium-phosphate energy storage technology safety in regard to fires was limited.

Ameliasburgh Councillor Janice Maynard, who was supportive of staff’s BESS recommendation, had the following to say about the differences that lithium-phosphate technology offers (compared to the lithium-ion technology of the previous Picton BESS site proposal):

Council voted 8 to 5 against the Athol BESS. Mayor Steve Ferguson, before voting in the negative, outlined his position with the following words:

Last December, Ontario’s Minister of Energy, Todd Smith, issued a directive that made it a requirement to have municipal council support for IESO approval of BESS projects.

Listen to the full story below: