Queens mayor says new land use bylaws protect rural areas from urban development

People sitting in chairs listen to a presentation
Public hearing on Queens proposed land use bylaw. Photo Ed Halverson
Ed Halverson - QCCR/CJQC - LiverpoolNS | 20-05-2022
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on email
Share on print

At a third and final public hearing in Liverpool Queens residents were vocal that a proposed new land use bylaw shouldn’t change the face of rural Queens.

The crowd gathered at the Liverpool Fire Hall took the opportunity to tell Region of Queens council some of the new regulations introduced in the bylaw would interfere with their ability to produce and raise food for their families and community.

Ria Neish is raising 40 chickens and three pigs on 300 acres of land in South Brookfield.

Neish doesn’t feel it’s reasonable to ask someone like herself who is not running a commercial farming operation to apply for permits to be allowed to supply food for themselves.

“Food is deplete in the grocery stores. The animals are treated deplorably in the grocery stores. That is why we live where we live. To raise animals well. To let them live full, happy, fulfilled life, living all their instincts out,” said Neish. “That’s why we’re doing what we’re doing and the fact that I would have to ask permission for that I do object to that.”

Frank Babin of Moose Harbour is concerned enforcing regulations on rural communities will change the culture in Queens.

He wants the region to allow people to continue to live as they have for hundreds of years.

“Especially the kids, ‘cause that’s who I’m thinking of. They used to go by and say hey look at that horse, look at that cow,” said Babin. “I don’t want to see that taken away ‘cause we are a rural community.”

Mayor Darlene Norman says some of the permitting requirements are there to ensure the region is aware of what kinds of activities are taking place on a piece of land.

“A development agreement is just in place to note that in addition to residential, there’s also household livestock as part of that main use, is how it was explained to me,” said Norman.

After reflecting on the discussion, the mayor is concerned that people feel the region is trying to force urban values on rural areas when in fact they’re designed to keep urban uses out of those rural areas.

“These documents actually protect rural interests like livestock farming, like household livestock, like forestry uses. It zones these wharves and says these are fishing marine areas,” said Norman. “So, I sometimes wonder if people have misinterpreted the value of them. Because the majority of our lands are rural, and they allow rural uses.”

Now that the second public hearing sessions are complete, the proposed bylaw will go back to council for consideration at their next meeting May 24.

Council will review the public input and determine whether to make any adjustments before voting on the bylaw.

E-mail: edhalversonnews@gmail.com
Twitter: @edwardhalverson

To listen to the broadcast of this story, press play below.